WARN Act in the News: Why Employers Need to Know the Law
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act is a federal law that requires employers with 100 or more employees to provide at least 60 days’ notice to employees before a plant closing or mass layoff. With the many large reductions in force that have occurred recently, the Act has been highlighted in the news. Some employers have been called out by former employees for cutting corners and not abiding by the law. What’s at stake? This article explains the WARN Act at a high level while also providing some considerations to take into account if the WARN Act is on your radar. The purpose of the WARN Act is to give employees and their families some transition time to adjust to the prospective loss of employment, to seek and obtain other employment, and, if necessary, to enter skill training or retraining programs that will allow these employees to successfully compete in the job market. The WARN Act applies to employers who employ 100 or more employees, including both full-time and part-time employees. Employers are also required to give notice to the state dislocated worker unit and the chief elected official of the unit of local government in which the employment site is located. The WARN Act applies to both private and public sector employers, and it applies to all types of businesses, including for-profit and non-profit organizations. There are some exceptions to the WARN Act, such as if the closing or layoff is the result of a natural disaster or a strike or lockout not caused by the employer. Additionally, if an employer can demonstrate that the closing or layoff is caused by a faltering company, and that giving notice would have prevented the employer from obtaining necessary capital or business, the employer may be excused from providing notice. Violations of the WARN Act can result in penalties, including back pay and benefits for each day of violation, as well as civil penalties of up to $500 per day per employee. Additional costs in the form of expenses of time and resources are ones that many organizations can’t afford—especially during a time of layoffs and/or restructuring. Lawsuits have been filed in a number of industries by former employees seeking damages from companies who failed to comply with the WARN Act, demonstrating that any organization with 100+ employees is at risk of legal action if it doesn’t honor the law. Former employees of Twitter filed a class action lawsuit against the company for failing to provide 60 days advance notice before the mass layoffs, as required by the state of California. Not long before that, former workers from United Furniture, one of the country’s largest furniture manufacturers, filed lawsuits against the company for failing to comply with the WARN Act. Orlando resorts company Rosen Hotels and Resorts settled for $2.3 million in a lawsuit brought against them by over 3,600 employees for failing to give notice of their employment status, paying them, or providing benefits during a 6-month furlough period. Layoffs affect workers in multiple ways, with financial, emotional, and mental consequences. Mitigating lawsuits and reducing the negative impacts of these unfortunate events for both employees and the organization is possible when you have information and processes in place before you actually need them. Consider the following: Sources: INTOO’s outplacement program helps employees transition to new jobs through an unlimited number of hours of one-on-one, on-demand coaching from premier career counselors, resume reviews, and other career services. Learn more about how our outplacement program can benefit your company when you’re transitioning employees.The Purpose of the WARN Act
Who does the WARN Act apply to?
Are there any exceptions to the WARN Act?
What are the risks of violating the WARN Act?
WARN Act in the News
Tech
Manufacturing
Hospitality
How Employers Can Protect Themselves